Accessibility monitoring for agencies
Skipnav runs automated WCAG 2.1 AA testing across every client site your agency maintains, and emails you when a change introduces a failure that wasn't there last week. Reports go out under your branding, not ours.
No overlay widget. No compliance guarantees. No sales call.
Any free tool will tell you a site has 40 accessibility issues. What actually helps is knowing which three appeared on Tuesday, on which page, and probably from which change. That takes history, and it's the whole product.
compared against last week's run + critical button-name /contact — submit button lost its label + critical image-alt /contact — new image link has no alt text + serious link-name /contact - critical image-alt 6 pages — logo alt added sitewide, template fix 17 issues unchanged · full report attached · WCAG 2.1 A/AA
Every other vendor charges by the site, which punishes you for having clients. $149/month covers fifteen of them.
When one rule fails on most of a site's pages it's almost always one defect in a shared template. We say so, so you fix once instead of forty times.
PDFs go out branded as your agency's work, because that's what they are. Bill them into an existing care plan.
No script on your clients' sites, no plugin, no DNS change. We test the public pages the way a visitor's browser would.
Cancel any time, from the dashboard, without emailing anyone.
Automated testing finds roughly 57% of WCAG issues. That figure comes from the authors of axe-core, the open-source engine we run. It is the honest ceiling for any automated scanner, including ours and including every competitor's.
A machine cannot tell whether alternative text is meaningful, whether a page can be navigated end to end with a screen reader, or whether the reading order makes sense. Those require a person.
So: Skipnav does not certify compliance with the ADA, WCAG, or Section 508. It is not legal advice, and it will not make anyone lawsuit-proof. In 2025 the FTC ordered an accessibility vendor to pay $1 million over claims of that kind. We would rather tell you the limit up front than sell past it.
What it does: finds the mechanical failures fast, across a lot of sites, repeatedly, and tells you the moment a new one appears. That is a real and useful thing, and it is all we claim.
It is free, and if you have two or three sites you should run it yourself — genuinely. We'd rather say that than take $49 from someone who doesn't need us.
What you'd pay for is that it runs on schedule across a whole portfolio and tells you what changed. A single scan can't do that; it has no memory.
No, deliberately. Remediation is development work, and it's work you're better placed to do — or bill your client for. Some agencies use the report as the scope document for a paid accessibility sprint.
No. Nothing gets installed on your clients' sites. Overlays have repeatedly failed to prevent litigation and courts have not treated them as conformance; we don't sell one.
No. We request one page at a time with a delay between requests, honour robots.txt, and never touch anything behind a login. A weekly scan of a 50-page site is a rounding error in that site's traffic.
No. Everything is on this page, questions get answered by email. If you want a call you can have one, but it isn't a step.